✓ Small teams with repeated customer-story requests
✓ Readers comparing concrete collection and review requirements
✓ Businesses needing an understandable publication inventory
— Fake reviews or manufactured endorsements
— Regulated advice or legal-compliance certification
— Generic CRM, course delivery or agency project management
Compare the same billing basis
On 24 September 2026, Boast listed annual-plan equivalents of $50, $100 and $208 per month for Basic, Team and Premium; monthly billing was $59, $119 and $249. Annual equivalents are not month-to-month prices. Calculate the full commitment and confirm current checkout details before purchase. Taxes, currency conversion and your staff time are outside this comparison.
Find the requirement that forces a tier
The displayed response allowances were 50, 150 and 500 per month, or 600, 1,800 and 6,000 per year on annual plans. The pricing matrix calls its first column Plus while the cards call it Basic; confirm that naming mismatch instead of inferring a separate offer. Blank extracted feature cells are not proof of entitlement. A custom consent agreement is documented for Premium, which can matter more than response volume.
Count work as well as subscription cost
Our budget worksheet uses your own expected submissions and reviewer time. It does not predict how many customers will respond. A cheap account that produces an unreviewed backlog is not necessarily a good purchase, and an expensive tier is not justified by features nobody will use. Separate must-have constraints from conveniences that can wait until the workflow is operating.
Avoid treating cancellation as a refund
The observed pricing FAQ says refunds are not offered. Read the current billing conditions before committing; a cancellation control and reimbursement are different things. If your requirement remains unclear, do not buy solely to resolve a comparison table. Ask a precise entitlement question, retain the answer and compare a smaller manual approach or another provider. No purchase is necessary to use this guide.
An original decision example
Illustrative decision: a team needs only twenty new responses but requires its own approved agreement link. A response-count calculation alone would recommend the wrong tier. Document the permission requirement first, confirm the current entitlement with the provider, and compare that commitment against alternatives that meet the same requirement.
The evidence behind this buying guidance
This guide draws on Boast plans, billing and response allowances, Boast sequence enrollment definition and limits, Boast consent states and agreed terms. Merchant-controlled records describe the provider’s own capabilities, terms or standards; they do not independently validate those claims. These records do not establish independent confirmation of the product claims.
Verify any current price, plan limit, label direction, compatibility rule, or commercial term that would materially change the decision. The dated source ledger shows the underlying records so this conclusion can be checked and updated.
Sources used for this page
These records support the facts and comparisons above. Merchant-controlled records are labelled so you can separate product claims from independent evidence.
- Boast plans, billing and response allowances — Merchant documentation · boast.io · Merchant-controlled · checked 2026-09-24
- Boast sequence enrollment definition and limits — Merchant documentation · boast.io · Merchant-controlled · checked 2026-09-24
- Boast consent states and agreed terms — Merchant documentation · boast.io · Merchant-controlled · checked 2026-09-24